Assessment of Insulin Injection Techniques and Associated Factors in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-sectional Study at the Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia
Zouaoui Chadia *
Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia.
Bchir Najla
Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia.
Boughariou Sana
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Background: Correct insulin injection technique is vital for effective diabetes management and the prevention of cutaneous complications. Nevertheless, deviations from recommended injection guidelines remain widespread in real-world clinical practice.
Aims: This study aimed to assess insulin injection techniques in diabetic patients and to identify factors associated with glycaemic control and injection pain.
Study Design and Setting: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Endocrinology and Nutrition Department of the Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia, over a two-month period from January to February 2023.
Methodology: We included 50 patients (28 men and 22 women; age range, 24–85 years) with type 1 diabetes or insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes. The 30-item questionnaire was adapted from the “Updated 2017 French Diabetes Society Paramedical Best Practice Guidelines”. It covered insulin storage, injection sites, filling and priming techniques, injection practices, post-use waste management, and injection pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Results: The mean age was 56.4 ± 19.4 years, and the mean duration of diabetes was 13.3 years, with a mean HbA1c of 10.2%. The mean duration of insulin therapy was 7.4 ± 5.5 years; the regimens were bedtime insulin (22%), basal insulin (36%), basal-plus (20%), and basal-bolus (22%). The mean number of daily injections was three (range, one to six). Thirty-three patients had received education, mainly regarding insulin storage (78.8%) and injection-site selection (63.6%). Only 20% of patients rotated injection sites regularly, 14% systematically screened for lipodystrophy, and 48% used the skin-fold technique; needle reuse and unsafe waste disposal were reported by 86% and 94%, respectively.
Glycaemic control was associated with injection-site rotation (P = .01), injection into lipodystrophic areas (P = .03), and use of the skin-fold technique (P = .01). The presence and intensity of injection pain were associated with the mean number of injections per needle (P = .04 and P = .001, respectively).
Conclusion: Substantial knowledge and practice gaps remain in insulin administration among patients with diabetes. Structured therapeutic education programmes in diabetes clinics and inpatient units are needed to address these deficiencies.
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, insulin injection technique, glycaemic control, therapeutic patient education, needle reuse, injection-site rotation, lipodystrophy, skin-fold technique, injection pain, sharps disposal