An Update on the Clinical Scoring Systems for Acute Appendicitis: A Review

Kumar H.R. *

Taylor University School of Medicine and Health Science, 47500 Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Clinical scoring systems have been employed in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, demonstrating varying levels of efficacy. The Alvarado scoring system is the most prevalent, followed by other systems such as the RIPASA and AIR systems. These scoring systems are generally effective in excluding appendicitis or identifying patients who may require additional imaging, such as ultrasound or computed tomography. However, clinical scoring systems are not typically used in isolation to diagnose acute appendicitis. This review article has been conducted to examine the commonly utilised scoring systems and assess their sensitivity and specificity. A literature review was conducted using secondary sources. Findings indicate that all the studies scored were good at ruling out acute appendicitis, but they cannot be used on their own to diagnose acute appendicitis. Further investigations, such as imaging with ultrasound or computerised tomography, may be required to diagnose acute appendicitis. Further randomised, prospective studies are required to more comprehensively assess their clinical efficacy.

Keywords: Clinical scoring systems, acute appendicitis, Alvarado score, Ripasa score, AIR score


How to Cite

H.R., K. (2026). An Update on the Clinical Scoring Systems for Acute Appendicitis: A Review. Medical Science: Updates and Prospects Vol. 4, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/msup/v4/6855