Medical Research: Emerging Concepts and Applications Vol. 4 https://stm2.bookpi.org/MRECA-V4 en-US Medical Research: Emerging Concepts and Applications Vol. 4 Clinical Assessment and Rehabilitation of Lingual Lymphedema Following Head and Neck Cancer Treatment https://stm2.bookpi.org/MRECA-V4/article/view/1741 <p>Lingual lymphedema is an uncommon but functionally significant complication that may occur after treatment for head and neck cancer. The tongue plays an essential role in oral intake, speech, posture, breathing comfort, and sleep; therefore, persistent tongue swelling can substantially affect daily functioning and quality of life. This case report describes the clinical assessment, conservative rehabilitation, and 9-month outcomes of a 58-year-old male who developed post-treatment tongue lymphedema after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the lower alveolus. The patient presented with severe tongue swelling and protrusion, restricted tongue mobility, cervical fibrosis, difficulty with speech, impaired oral intake, and disturbed sleep. Rehabilitation was based on Complete Decongestive Therapy principles, including manual lymphatic drainage, intraoral drainage techniques, gentle pressure strategies, positioning, tongue mobility exercises, oral hygiene measures, breathing exercises, and jaw mobilisation. Outcomes were monitored using circumferential measurement, photographic comparison, functional observations, and patient-reported measures. Over 9 months, tongue circumference decreased from 12.5 cm to 9.5 cm, tongue protrusion decreased from 4.5 cm to 2.3 cm, the ability to lie supine improved from 0.2 hours to 5–6 hours, and speech clarity improved from 2 to 3.5 on a 5-point scale. Improvements were also observed in global health status, sleep, and social functioning. The case highlights the potential value of early, structured and patient-centred rehabilitation in managing lingual lymphedema.</p> Jagmohan Lal Meena Poonam Joshi Blossom Baby S. K. Meena Shaloo Choudhary Simanta Buragohain Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the publisher (BP International). 2026-09-19 2026-09-19 1 8 10.9734/bpi/mreca/v4/7959 Prism-Based Optical Management of Bilateral Type I Duane Retraction Syndrome: A Case Report https://stm2.bookpi.org/MRECA-V4/article/view/1742 <p>Duane Retraction Syndrome (DRS) is a congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder characterised by limitation of horizontal ocular movements, globe retraction, and narrowing of the palpebral fissure on adduction. This case report describes the conservative management of bilateral Type I DRS using bilateral base-in prism correction. A 6-year-old girl presented with a compensatory right face turn present since early childhood. Best-corrected visual acuity was 6/6 in both eyes. Ocular motility examination demonstrated bilateral limitation of abduction graded as −2, with mild Grade 1 globe retraction and palpebral fissure narrowing on adduction. The compensatory right face turn measured approximately 5° for distance fixation and 10° for near fixation. Prism bar cover testing showed an exodeviation of 8 prism dioptres at distance and 25 prism dioptres at near. Because primary gaze alignment was satisfactory, binocular single vision was preserved, amblyopia was absent, and the abnormal head posture was mild, a 5-prism-dioptre base-in prism was prescribed for each eye. At six months, the patient had adapted well to prism wear, and the compensatory head posture had resolved while the prisms were worn. Best-corrected visual acuity, ocular alignment, and binocular single vision remained stable throughout follow-up. This case indicates that bilateral base-in prism correction may provide a useful conservative option for carefully selected patients with bilateral Type I DRS and mild abnormal head posture.</p> Sonia Madhvee Mishra Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the publisher (BP International). 2026-09-19 2026-09-19 9 17 10.9734/bpi/mreca/v4/8023 Blood Flow under the Denture Base: Rethinking the Vascular Behaviour of Denture-Supporting Oral Mucosa under Local and Systemic Circulatory Stress https://stm2.bookpi.org/MRECA-V4/article/view/1743 <p>Denture-supporting oral mucosa is repeatedly exposed to mechanical loading while relying on a terminal microvascular network to restore perfusion between loading cycles. This narrative synthesis examines the vascular behaviour of denture-bearing tissues under local prosthetic loading and systemic circulatory stress. The evidence indicates that sustained compression and cyclic masticatory loading produce different perfusion responses. Sustained loading can markedly suppress mucosal blood flow, whereas intermittent loading may produce net hyperaemia through repeated release and reactive reperfusion. These findings are more coherently interpreted in relation to loading duty cycle and recovery time than to peak interfacial pressure alone. Evidence linking altered mucosal perfusion directly to long-term residual ridge resorption remains limited, with most human studies involving small samples, short observation periods, or surrogate populations. Systemic conditions associated with reduced capillary density or impaired vascular reserve, including diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and vasospastic disorders, may further constrain recovery after loading, but their interaction with denture-bearing mucosa has not been directly established. Current perfusion-measurement techniques provide useful physiological information but lack sufficient standardisation and interpretability for routine prosthodontic diagnosis. The available evidence therefore supports cautious clinical emphasis on load distribution, tissue recovery, and denture removal during prolonged periods of dependency or critical illness, while highlighting the need for standardised studies of vascular reserve in actual denture wearers.</p> S. Amuthan M. Gayathri K. Barath Raj N. Thirupurasundari Hibah Hasan P. Premavathi Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the publisher (BP International). 2026-09-19 2026-09-19 18 36 10.9734/bpi/mreca/v4/8024 Informed Consent in Healthcare and Research: Ethical Principles, Practical Challenges, and Emerging Directions - A Narrative Review https://stm2.bookpi.org/MRECA-V4/article/view/1744 <p>Informed consent is both an ethical authorisation and a communicative process through which patients and research participants are enabled to make decisions that accord with their values. Its normative foundations are well established, yet persistent gaps between formal requirements and lived practice challenge the assumption that a signed form reliably indicates understanding or voluntariness. This critical narrative review integrates ethical theory, clinical communication, research ethics, empirical studies of comprehension, intervention evidence, and emerging digital and data-intensive practices. Literature from 1947 to 5 July 2026 was identified through multidisciplinary scholarly sources, supplemented by authoritative ethics and regulatory documents and citation searching. The evidence indicates that valid consent depends on decision-specific capacity, material and comprehensible disclosure, meaningful opportunity for questions and deliberation, freedom from controlling influence, and an affirmative authorisation. Across both clinical care and research, comprehension is frequently incomplete, particularly for probabilistic risk, randomisation, placebo use, alternatives, and the distinction between research and individualised care. The strongest intervention evidence favours interactive communication, test-feedback or teach-back approaches, professional language support, and well-designed digital or multimedia tools, whereas readability improvement or document shortening alone produces inconsistent benefits. Research consent additionally confronts therapeutic misconception, payment and structural pressures, emergency enrolment, paediatric assent, broad consent for secondary use, and the governance of longitudinal data. Electronic and dynamic consent can improve access, traceability and participant control, but may also transfer burdens to participants and reproduce digital inequities. Artificial intelligence raises a newer question: when algorithmic involvement is sufficiently material to require notification or explicit consent. The review argues that consent quality should be judged less by document completion and more by supported decision-making, proportionate communication, validated assessment where stakes or vulnerability are high, and governance that protects autonomy without treating individuals as isolated decision-makers. Future research should prioritise outcome-valid consent measures, equity-sensitive intervention trials, and context-specific standards for digital and artificial-intelligence-mediated decision support.</p> Pheagane Motsime William Nkoana Mapula Precious Rapao Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the publisher (BP International). 2026-09-19 2026-09-19 37 66 10.9734/bpi/mreca/v4/7934