Integrated Agronomic Management for Sustainable Cropping Systems: Linking Sulphur Nutrition, Plant Growth-Promoting Inputs, Organic Amendments and Crop Diversification

Review History

Published: 2026-10-13

DOI: 10.9734/bpi/bsrdi/v5/8151

Page: 84-112


Sunil Kumar Prajapati *

Division of Agronomy, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi 110012, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Sustainable crop production increasingly depends on managing interacting constraints rather than correcting single nutrient deficiencies or deploying isolated inputs. Sulphur (S) deficiency, variable field performance of plant growth-promoting microbial inputs, declining soil organic matter, and simplified crop sequences are often treated as separate agronomic problems, although each influences nutrient turnover, rhizosphere function, crop resource capture and resilience. This critical narrative review evaluates how S nutrition, plant growth-promoting inputs, organic amendments and crop diversification can be integrated within coherent cropping-system management. Literature published principally from 2000 to 25 July 2026 was identified through agricultural, biomedical and multidisciplinary scholarly sources, with older foundational studies retained where conceptually necessary. Evidence was appraised according to field relevance, experimental duration, comparators, environmental characterisation, replication, response consistency and transferability. The strongest evidence supports four conclusions. First, S fertilisation is most effective when soil S supply is genuinely limiting and nitrogen (N) nutrition, water supply and crop demand are considered jointly. Second, beneficial microbial inputs can improve nutrient acquisition and stress tolerance, but field efficacy is substantially more variable than controlled-environment performance because establishment, native microbiomes, soil fertility and formulation constrain response. Third, organic amendments act not only as nutrient sources but also as substrates and habitat modifiers that can strengthen soil biological functions; nevertheless, their yield advantage beyond adequate mineral nutrition is context dependent. Fourth, crop diversification changes the temporal and spatial distribution of roots, residues and microbial substrates and can improve nutrient cycling, soil carbon and multiple ecosystem services, although benefits may diminish under high external-input conditions. The synthesis therefore favours diagnosis-led integration rather than additive input stacking. Long-term factorial field experiments that explicitly test S source, microbial function, amendment quality and crop sequence are a priority for establishing when interactions are synergistic, merely additive or antagonistic.

Keywords: Sulphur use efficiency, rhizosphere microbiome, microbial inoculants, oil organic matter, crop rotation, intercropping, nutrient cycling, sustainable intensification


How to Cite

Prajapati, S. K. (2026). Integrated Agronomic Management for Sustainable Cropping Systems: Linking Sulphur Nutrition, Plant Growth-Promoting Inputs, Organic Amendments and Crop Diversification. Biological Science: Research Developments and Innovations Vol. 5, 84–112. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/bsrdi/v5/8151